Well, more results are in from the Great Homebrew
Digest Pale Ale experiment. If you were at the June meeting, you may remember tasting two
IPAs, one from me and one from Bob Wilcox. We made the beer along with 40 or so other
brewers across the country from an identical recipe. The ingredients were all parceled out
of the same bags and weighed out on the same scale. The only difference was the individual
brewers equipment and techniques.
Several bottles of each beer were sent to Portland for a Brewing
Techniques sponsored tasting. A beer score sheet would have been worthless in this
endeavor, since the idea was to find out how the beers differed and not to judge the beers
against a style. The procedure was to combine ten or twelve beers in a pitcher and use
this as a standard. Each entry was then judged relative to this standard in several
different categories on a 5 ("less than standard") to +5 ("more than
standard") scale.
Im not quite sure how to read the score sheets and what use they are
to me by themselves. My "bitterness" scores were all over the placeI had a
3, a 1, and a +3. Some individual judge differences there. My
"maltiness" scores, though, were all positive. In fact, I "won" the
malt category by having the most malt flavor. I wonder why my beer might have more malt
flavor than the others. Nothing in my procedure springs to mind.
Several more bottles were shipped to Louis Bonham in Houston to do some
lab work. Louis is a lawyer, but somehow he has learned enough organic chem to do some
beer analysis. He streaked the beer out to check on cleanliness. Five or six brewers came
through with flying colors, but both Bob and I had a fair number of bugs in our beers. Not
enough to hurt the flavor, but not a good sign for long-term storage. I wonder if the bugs
are in my keg or in my counter-pressure filled bottles. I generally dont sanitize my
bottles that well figuring theyll be emptied soon enough.
The more interesting lab data is the IBU calculations. The beers all came
between 55 and 90 IBUs or so. No word yet on what might contribute to such a big range.
The majority of beers, however, were in the mid 60s. Using good old Jackie Ragers
formula for estimating IBUs, with no correction for pellets and a maximum utilization of
31%, I get about 61 IBUs. Pretty close to measured. Garetz much maligned formula gives
something like 38. Quite a difference. This was a pretty bitter beer. People have reported
numbers from Glen Tinseths formulas anywhere from 44 to 54; I havent found the
formula myself. So after years of arguing about formulas and publication of both
Tinseths and Garetzs "improved" equations, Rager still comes out
looking pretty good.
Hopefully at the meeting well have more results of tasting and lab
work.
Congratulations:
Bob Wilcox, who took gold at the Alameda Cty Fair with his Boh. Pilsener.
Upcoming events:
5th Annual Queen of Beer competition, open to all women homebrewers.
Judging will be Oct. 10 at Jack Russell Brewing Company. Contact Nora Keller-Seeley for
details at (M-F day) 916-854-4344 or evenings at 530-676-2237or E-Mail:
nkseeley@jps.net.